Skip to main content

The lost art of respect: Reclaiming our common humanity

By
Jess Oaks — Torrington Telegram, Dec. 9

There's a conversation we need to have as Americans; one we've been avoiding for far too long. It's about respect – not the superficial politeness we perform on social media or the forced civility we muster at Thanksgiving dinner, but genuine respect for our fellow human beings regardless of how they vote, what they believe or where they stand on the issues dividing our nation.

We've lost something essential in recent years. We've lost the ability to see past our differences and recognize the fundamental humanity we all share. We've allowed our political identities to become so central to who we are that we've forgotten the most basic lesson most of us learned in kindergarten: treat others the way you want to be treated.

This isn't about being soft or naive. This isn't about pretending our disagreements don't matter or that all opinions deserve equal weight. This is about remembering that before any of us are conservatives or progressives, Republicans or Democrats, we are human beings who deserve to be treated with dignity.

Consider how dramatically our public discourse has deteriorated. We no longer simply disagree with those on the other side of the political spectrum – we question their intelligence, their morality and their right to participate in civic life. We don't just oppose their policies; we assume the worst about their character. We've created a culture where political affiliation has become grounds for dismissing someone's entire worth as a person.

When did we decide this was acceptable?

I remember a time when political differences didn't automatically translate into personal animosity. My parents' generation tells stories of neighbors who voted differently but still helped each other with home repairs, shared tools over the fence and looked after each other's children. They speak of coworkers who argued passionately about politics over lunch but still collaborated effectively and maintained genuine friendships.

These weren't saints or exceptional people. They were ordinary Americans who understood something we seem to have forgotten: you can profoundly disagree with someone's politics while still respecting them as a person.

We've been conditioned to view politics as a zero-sum game where the other side isn't just wrong but evil. Where compromise is betrayal and finding common ground is weakness. Where the person who disagrees with you isn't a fellow citizen with different priorities but an enemy who must be defeated at all costs.

This mentality is destroying us.

It's destroying our families. How many people have you heard say they can't talk to certain relatives anymore because of politics? How many holiday gatherings have been ruined by arguments about elections? How many parents have become estranged from their adult children over voting choices?

It's destroying our communities. Neighbors who once looked out for each other now avoid eye contact because of yard signs. Local school board meetings have devolved into shouting matches. Community organizations struggle to function because members can't get past their political differences.

It's destroying our capacity for empathy. We've become so entrenched in our ideological bubbles we've lost the ability to understand how someone could possibly see things differently. We don't even try anymore. We simply assume anyone who disagrees with us is ignorant, brainwashed or acting in bad faith.

But here's what we're missing: the people on the other side of our political divides are not caricatures. They're not the cartoon villains our preferred media outlets make them out to be. They're real people with complex lives, genuine concerns and reasons for believing what they believe.

That Republican voter you're quick to dismiss? Maybe they grew up in a small town watching factories close and jobs disappear, and they genuinely believe different economic policies might help. That doesn't make them a bigot. It makes them someone whose life experience has shaped their political views differently than yours.

That Democrat you're ready to write off? Perhaps they've watched friends struggle without healthcare or seen family members face discrimination, and they sincerely believe government has a role in addressing these injustices. That doesn't make them a socialist who hates America. It makes them someone whose compassion has led them to different conclusions about the best path forward.

We're all products of our experiences, our communities and our values. We simply disagree – sometimes vehemently – about how to achieve our shared goals.

Those disagreements matter. Policy decisions have real consequences. None of this is to suggest we should stop fighting for what we believe in.

But we can fight for our convictions without dehumanizing those who oppose us. We can advocate passionately for our values while still treating our opponents with basic respect. We can believe someone is completely wrong about an issue without believing they're a terrible person.

In fact, we must. Because the alternative is the path we're currently on, and it leads nowhere good.

When we allow political differences to override our commitment to basic human decency, we all lose. We lose the possibility of productive dialogue. We lose the ability to find solutions to shared problems. We lose the social bonds holding our communities together.

Most Americans, regardless of party affiliation, want similar things. We want safe neighborhoods where our kids can play outside. We want good schools providing real opportunities. We want jobs offering dignity and fair wages. We want affordable healthcare. We want a future where our children can thrive.

Our disagreements are about means, not ends. We differ on the best way to achieve these shared goals, on the proper role of government and on which values should take priority when they conflict. These are legitimate disagreements worthy of robust debate.

But they're not reasons to abandon our commitment to treating each other with respect.

Respect doesn't mean agreement. It doesn't mean staying silent when you witness injustice or refraining from calling out harmful policies. It doesn't mean pretending all viewpoints are equally valid.

Respect means recognizing the humanity in those who disagree with you. It means assuming good faith unless proven otherwise. It means listening to understand rather than simply waiting for your turn to talk.

Respect means remembering that the person on the other side of your political disagreement is someone's parent, someone's child, someone's friend. They have hopes and fears. They're doing their best to navigate a complex world, just like you.

This isn't easy. It requires emotional discipline, intellectual humility and a willingness to resist the tribal impulses our political culture encourages. It means swimming against a powerful current of polarization.

But it's necessary. Because a democracy cannot function when citizens view each other as enemies. A society cannot thrive when basic respect becomes conditional on political alignment.

So here's the challenge: can we commit to treating people with respect regardless of their political beliefs? Can we extend grace to those who see the world differently? Can we remember that being a decent human being isn't contingent on voting the right way?

Can we be better than our worst impulses and rise above the toxic culture our politics has created?

I believe we can. I have to believe we can. Because if we can't find our way back to basic respect for one another, then all our political victories will be hollow and all our policy debates will be meaningless.

We'll have won the argument but lost ourselves in the process.

--- Online Subscribers: Please click here to log in to read this story and access all content.

Not an Online Subscriber? Click here for a one-week subscription for only $5!.